More on politicized pubic hair

I’m an avowed fan of furry pussy, but I’m frustrated by these tired claims that a lack of hair renders a woman pre-pubescent looking. Since porn is so often credited with kicking off the fervor for female shaving, it might be helpful to recognize that shaved pussy in porn relates to visibility issues, not infantilization of all performers. (Admittedly, it serves dual purposes for the barely legal crew, who—it bears repeating—are often of advanced legality.)

I had a customer once tell me he reminded me of his daughter. According to him, she was eight years old, and he wanted to spend his session calling me by her name, pretending he was cajoling me/her into sitting on his lap, etc. For the aforementioned visibility, I kept myself totally shaved for the majority of my time on webcam. However, I’m 5’10” with large breasts, distinct hips, and woman’s voice. The idea that I’m reminiscent of anyone younger than the most mature sixteen year old is laughable. I don’t believe he was telling me the truth; much of what customers said on webcam was designed primarily to provoke a strong reaction whether it was positive or negative. And he succeeded in making me deeply uncomfortable.

Avid shavers generally promote the feel of being bare far more often than they do the look. Furthermore, if you believe a woman’s age is indicated by nothing more than her pubic hair, aren’t you suggesting by extension that a fifteen year old with a bush convincingly passes as an adult? Why is this argument not extended to men who shave their pubic hair? I’ve never heard a woman (or man) accused of being a pedophile when she or he says they like their male partner shaved.

There are plenty of ways to promote pubes that will win more hearts and minds than name calling. For instance: visual evidence.